[Jun 07, 2024] ARA-R01 Dumps PDF and Test Engine Exam Questions - ValidBraindumps [Q29-Q48] : Free valid test braindumps : http://free.validbraindumps.com

Q29. An Architect is using SnowCD to investigate a connectivity issue.
Which system function will provide a list of endpoints that the network must be able to access to use a specific Snowflake account, leveraging private connectivity?

SYSTEMSALLOWLIST ()

SYSTEMSGET_PRIVATELINK

SYSTEMSAUTHORIZE_PRIVATELINK

SYSTEMSALLOWLIST_PRIVATELINK ()

Q30. Data is being imported and stored as JSON in a VARIANT column. Query performance was fine, but most recently, poor query performance has been reported.
What could be causing this?

There were JSON nulls in the recent data imports.

The order of the keys in the JSON was changed.

The recent data imports contained fewer fields than usual.

There were variations in string lengths for the JSON values in the recent dataimports.

Data is being imported and stored as JSON in a VARIANT column. Query performance was fine, but most recently, poor query performance has been reported. This could be caused by the following factors:
The order of the keys in the JSON was changed. Snowflake stores semi-structured data internally in a column-like structure for the most common elements, and the remainder in a leftovers-like column. The order of the keys in the JSON affects how Snowflake determines the common elements and how it optimizes the query performance. If the order of the keys in the JSON was changed, Snowflake might have to re-parse the data and re-organize the internal storage, which could result in slower query performance.
There were variations in string lengths for the JSON values in the recent data imports. Non-native values, such as dates and timestamps, are stored as strings when loaded into a VARIANT column.
Operations on these values could be slower and also consume more space than when stored in a relational column with the corresponding data type. If there were variations in string lengths for the JSON values in the recent data imports, Snowflake might have to allocate more space and perform more conversions, which could also result in slower query performance.
The other options are not valid causes for poor query performance:
There were JSON nulls in the recent data imports. Snowflake supports two types of null values in semi-structured data: SQL NULL and JSON null. SQL NULL means the value is missing or unknown, while JSON null means the value is explicitly set to null. Snowflake can distinguish between these two types of null values and handle them accordingly. Having JSON nulls in the recent data imports should not affect the query performance significantly.
The recent data imports contained fewer fields than usual. Snowflake can handle semi-structured data with varying schemas and fields. Having fewer fields than usual in the recent data imports should not affect the query performance significantly, as Snowflake can still optimize the data ingestion and query execution based on the existing fields.
References:
Considerations for Semi-structured Data Stored in VARIANT
Snowflake Architect Training
Snowflake query performance on unique element in variant column
Snowflake variant performance

Q31. What Snowflake features should be leveraged when modeling using Data Vault?

Snowflake’s support of multi-table inserts into the data model’s Data Vault tables

Data needs to be pre-partitioned to obtain a superior data access performance

Scaling up the virtual warehouses will support parallel processing of new source loads

Snowflake’s ability to hash keys so that hash key joins can run faster than integer joins

Q32. Which steps are recommended best practices for prioritizing cluster keys in Snowflake? (Choose two.)

Choose columns that are frequently used in join predicates.

Choose lower cardinality columns to support clustering keys and cost effectiveness.

Choose TIMESTAMP columns with nanoseconds for the highest number of unique rows.

Choose cluster columns that are most actively used in selective filters.

Choose cluster columns that are actively used in the GROUP BY clauses.

Q33. Data is being imported and stored as JSON in a VARIANT column. Query performance was fine, but most recently, poor query performance has been reported.
What could be causing this?

There were JSON nulls in the recent data imports.

The order of the keys in the JSON was changed.

The recent data imports contained fewer fields than usual.

There were variations in string lengths for the JSON values in the recent data imports.

Data is being imported and stored as JSON in a VARIANT column. Query performance was fine, but most recently, poor query performance has been reported. This could be caused by the following factors:
* The order of the keys in the JSON was changed. Snowflake stores semi-structured data internally in a column-like structure for the most common elements, and the remainder in a leftovers-like column. The order of the keys in the JSON affects how Snowflake determines the common elements and how it optimizes the query performance. If the order of the keys in the JSON was changed, Snowflake might have to re-parse the data and re-organize the internal storage, which could result in slower query performance.
* There were variations in string lengths for the JSON values in the recent data imports. Non-native values, such as dates and timestamps, are stored as strings when loaded into a VARIANT column.
Operations on these values could be slower and also consume more space than when stored in a
* relational column with the corresponding data type. If there were variations in string lengths for the JSON values in the recent data imports, Snowflake might have to allocate more space and perform more conversions, which could also result in slower query performance.
The other options are not valid causes for poor query performance:
* There were JSON nulls in the recent data imports. Snowflake supports two types of null values in semi-structured data: SQL NULL and JSON null. SQL NULL means the value is missing or unknown, while JSON null means the value is explicitly set to null. Snowflake can distinguish between these two types of null values and handle them accordingly. Having JSON nulls in the recent data imports should not affect the query performance significantly.
* The recent data imports contained fewer fields than usual. Snowflake can handle semi-structured data with varying schemas and fields. Having fewer fields than usual in the recent data imports should not affect the query performance significantly, as Snowflake can still optimize the data ingestion and query execution based on the existing fields.
References:
* Considerations for Semi-structured Data Stored in VARIANT
* Snowflake Architect Training
* Snowflake query performance on unique element in variant column
* Snowflake variant performance

Q34. A company has an inbound share set up with eight tables and five secure views. The company plans to make the share part of its production data pipelines.
Which actions can the company take with the inbound share? (Choose two.)

Clone a table from a share.

Grant modify permissions on the share.

Create a table from the shared database.

Create additional views inside the shared database.

Create a table stream on the shared table.

Q35. An Architect entered the following commands in sequence:

USER1 cannot find the table.
Which of the following commands does the Architect need to run for USER1 to find the tables using the Principle of Least Privilege? (Choose two.)

GRANT ROLE PUBLIC TO ROLE INTERN;

GRANT USAGE ON DATABASE SANDBOX TO ROLE INTERN;

GRANT USAGE ON SCHEMA SANDBOX.PUBLIC TO ROLE INTERN;

GRANT OWNERSHIP ON DATABASE SANDBOX TO USER INTERN;

GRANT ALL PRIVILEGES ON DATABASE SANDBOX TO ROLE INTERN;

Q36. A group of Data Analysts have been granted the role analyst role. They need a Snowflake database where they can create and modify tables, views, and other objects to load with their own data. The Analysts should not have the ability to give other Snowflake users outside of their role access to this data.
How should these requirements be met?

Grant ANALYST_R0LE OWNERSHIP on the database, but make sure that ANALYST_ROLE does not have the MANAGE GRANTS privilege on the account.

Grant SYSADMIN ownership of the database, but grant the create schema privilege on the database to the ANALYST_ROLE.

Make every schema in the database a managed access schema, owned by SYSADMIN, and grant create privileges on each schema to the ANALYST_ROLE for each type of object that needs to be created.

Grant ANALYST_ROLE ownership on the database, but grant the ownership on future [object type] s in database privilege to SYSADMIN.

Granting ANALYST_ROLE OWNERSHIP on the database allows the analysts to create and modify tables, views, and other objects within the database. However, to prevent the analysts from giving other Snowflake users outside of their role access to this data, the ANALYST_ROLE should not have the MANAGE GRANTS privilege on the account. The MANAGE GRANTS privilege enables a role to grant or revoke privileges on any object in the account, regardless of the ownership of the object1. Therefore, by removing this privilege from the ANALYST_ROLE, the analysts can only grant or revoke privileges onthe objects that they own within the database, and not on any other objects in the account2.
The other options are not correct because:
B). Granting SYSADMIN ownership of the database and granting the create schema privilege on the database to the ANALYST_ROLE would allow the analysts to create schemas within the database, but not to create or modify tables, views, or other objects within those schemas. The analysts would need to have the create [object type] privilege on each schema to create or modify objects within the schema3.
C). Making every schema in the database a managed access schema, owned by SYSADMIN, and granting create privileges on each schema to the ANALYST_ROLE for each type of object that needs to be created would allow the analysts to create and modify objects within the schemas, but not to grant or revoke privileges on those objects. A managed access schema is a schema that requires explicit grants for any access to the objects within the schema, regardless of the ownership of the objects4. Therefore, the analysts would need to have the grant privilege on each schema to grant or revoke privileges on the objects within the schema.
D). Granting ANALYST_ROLE ownership on the database and granting the ownership on future [object type] s in database privilege to SYSADMIN would allow the analysts to create and modify objects within the database, but also to grant or revoke privileges on those objects. The ownership on future
[object type] s in database privilege enables a role to automatically become the owner of any new object of the specified type that is created in the database. Therefore, by granting this privilege to SYSADMIN, the analysts would not be able to prevent SYSADMIN from accessing or modifying the objects that they create within the database.
References:
1: MANAGE GRANTS Privilege | Snowflake Documentation
2: Access Control Privileges | Snowflake Documentation
3: CREATE SCHEMA | Snowflake Documentation
4: Managed Access | Snowflake Documentation
: GRANT | Snowflake Documentation
: Ownership on Future Objects | Snowflake Documentation
: Ownership and Revoking Privileges | Snowflake Documentation

Q37. An Architect on a new project has been asked to design an architecture that meets Snowflake security, compliance, and governance requirements as follows:
1) Use Tri-Secret Secure in Snowflake
2) Share some information stored in a view with another Snowflake customer
3) Hide portions of sensitive information from some columns
4) Use zero-copy cloning to refresh the non-production environment from the production environment To meet these requirements, which design elements must be implemented? (Choose three.)

Define row access policies.

Use the Business-Critical edition of Snowflake.

Create a secure view.

Use the Enterprise edition of Snowflake.

Use Dynamic Data Masking.

Create a materialized view.

Q38. A table, EMP_ TBL has three records as shown:

The following variables are set for the session:

Which SELECT statements will retrieve all three records? (Select TWO).

Select * FROM Stbl_ref WHERE Scol_ref IN (‘Name1′,’Nam2′,’Name3’);

SELECT * FROM EMP_TBL WHERE identifier(Scol_ref) IN (‘Namel’,’Name2′, ‘Name3’);

SELECT * FROM identifier<Stbl_ref> WHERE NAME IN ($var1, $var2, $var3);

SELECT * FROM identifier($tbl_ref) WHERE ID IN Cvarl’,’var2′,’var3′);

SELECT * FROM $tb1_ref WHERE $col_ref IN ($var1, Svar2, Svar3);

Q39. A company’s Architect needs to find an efficient way to get data from an external partner, who is also a Snowflake user. The current solution is based on daily JSON extracts that are placed on an FTP server and uploaded to Snowflake manually. The files are changed several times each month, and the ingestion process needs to be adapted to accommodate these changes.
What would be the MOST efficient solution?

Ask the partner to create a share and add the company’s account.

Ask the partner to use the data lake export feature and place the data into cloud storage where Snowflake can natively ingest it (schema-on-read).

Keep the current structure but request that the partner stop changing files, instead only appending new files.

Ask the partner to set up a Snowflake reader account and use that account to get the data for ingestion.

The most efficient solution is to ask the partner to create a share and add the company’s account (Option A).
This way, the company can access the live data from the partner without any data movement or manual intervention. Snowflake’s secure datasharing feature allows data providers to share selected objects in a database with other Snowflake accounts. The shared data is read-only and does not incur any storage or compute costs for the data consumers. The data consumers can query the shared data directly or create local copies of the shared objects in their own databases. Option B is not efficient because it involves using the data lake export feature, which is intended for exporting data from Snowflake to an external data lake, not for importing data from another Snowflake account. The data lake export feature also requires the data provider to create an external stage on cloud storage and use the COPY INTO <location> command to export the data into parquet files. The data consumer then needs to create an external table or a file format to load the data from the cloud storage into Snowflake. This process can be complex and costly, especially if the data changes frequently. Option C is not efficient because it does not solve the problem of manual data ingestion and adaptation. Keeping the current structure of daily JSON extracts on an FTP server and requesting the partner to stop changing files, instead only appending new files, does not improve the efficiency or reliability of the data ingestion process. The company still needs to upload the data to Snowflake manually and deal with any schema changes or data quality issues. Option D is not efficient because it requires the partner to set up a Snowflake reader account and use that account to get the data for ingestion. A reader account is a special type of account that can only consume data from the provider account that created it. It is intended for data consumers who are not Snowflake customers and do not have a licensing agreement with Snowflake. A reader account is not suitable for data ingestion from another Snowflake account, as it does not allow uploading, modifying, or unloading data. The company would need to use external tools or interfaces to access the data from the reader account and load it into their own account, which can be slow and expensive. References: The answer can be verified from Snowflake’s official documentation on secure data sharing, data lake export, and reader accounts available on their website. Here are some relevant links:
Introduction to Secure Data Sharing | Snowflake Documentation
Data Lake Export Public Preview Is Now Available on Snowflake | Snowflake Blog Managing Reader Accounts | Snowflake Documentation

Q40. Assuming all Snowflake accounts are using an Enterprise edition or higher, in which development and testing scenarios would be copying of data be required, and zero-copy cloning not be suitable? (Select TWO).

Developers create their own datasets to work against transformed versions of the live data.

Production and development run in different databases in the same account, and Developers need to see production-like data but with specific columns masked.

Data is in a production Snowflake account that needs to be provided to Developers in a separate development/testing Snowflake account in the same cloud region.

Developers create their own copies of a standard test database previously created for them in the development account, for their initial development and unit testing.

The release process requires pre-production testing of changes with data of production scale and complexity. For security reasons, pre-production also runs in the production account.

Zero-copy cloning is a feature that allows creating a clone of a table, schema, or database without physically copying the data. Zero-copy cloning is suitable for scenarios where the cloned object needs to have the same data and metadata as the original object, and where the cloned object does not need to be modified or updated frequently. Zero-copy cloning is also suitable for scenarios where the cloned object needs to be shared within the same Snowflake account or across different accounts in the same cloud region2 However, zero-copy cloning is not suitable for scenarios where the cloned object needs to have different data or metadata than the original object, or where the cloned object needs to be modified or updated frequently.
Zero-copy cloning is also not suitable for scenarios where the cloned object needs to be shared across different accounts in different cloud regions. In these scenarios, copying of data would be required, either by using the COPY INTO command or by using data sharing with secure views3 The following are examples of development and testing scenarios where copying of data would be required, and zero-copy cloning would not be suitable:
* Developers create their own datasets to work against transformed versions of the live data. This scenario requires copying of data because the developers need to modify the data or metadata of the cloned object to perform transformations, such as adding, deleting, or updating columns, rows, or values. Zero-copy cloning would not be suitable because it would create a read-only clone that shares the same data and metadata as the original object, and any changes made to the clone would affect the original object as well4
* Data is in a production Snowflake account that needs to be provided to Developers in a separate development/testing Snowflake account in the same cloud region. This scenario requires copying of data because the data needs to be shared across different accounts in the same cloud region. Zero-copy cloning would not be suitable because it would create a clone within the same account as the original object, and it would not allow sharing the clone with another account. To share data across different accounts in the same cloud region, data sharing with secure views or COPY INTO command can be used5 The following are examples of development and testing scenarios where zero-copy cloning would be suitable, and copying of data would not be required:
* Production and development run in different databases in the same account, and Developers need to see production-like data but with specific columns masked. This scenario can use zero-copy cloning because the data needs to be shared within the same account, and the cloned object does not need to have different data or metadata than the original object. Zero-copy cloning can create a clone of the production database in the development database, and the clone can have the same data and metadata as the original database. To mask specific columns, secure views can be created on top of the clone, and the developers can access the secure views instead of the clone directly6
* Developers create their own copies of a standard test database previously created for them in the development account, for their initial development and unit testing. This scenario can use zero-copy cloning because the data needs to be shared within the same account, and the cloned object does not need to have different data or metadata than the original object. Zero-copy cloning can create a clone of the standard test database for each developer, and the clone can have the same data and metadata as the original database. The developers can use the clone for their initial development and unit testing, and any changes made to the clone would not affect the original database or other clones7
* The release process requires pre-production testing of changes with data of production scale and complexity. For security reasons, pre-production also runs in the production account. This scenario can use zero-copy cloning because the data needs to be shared within the same account, and the cloned object does not need to have different data or metadata than the original object. Zero-copy cloning can create a clone of the production database in the pre-production database, and the clone can have the same data and metadata as the original database. The pre-production testing can use the clone to test the changes with data of production scale and complexity, and any changes made to the clone would not affect the original database or the production environment8 References:
* 1: SnowPro Advanced: Architect | Study Guide 9
* 2: Snowflake Documentation | Cloning Overview
* 3: Snowflake Documentation | Loading Data Using COPY into a Table
* 4: Snowflake Documentation | Transforming Data During a Load
* 5: Snowflake Documentation | Data Sharing Overview
* 6: Snowflake Documentation | Secure Views
* 7: Snowflake Documentation | Cloning Databases, Schemas, and Tables
* 8: Snowflake Documentation | Cloning for Testing and Development
* : SnowPro Advanced: Architect | Study Guide
* : Cloning Overview
* : Loading Data Using COPY into a Table
* : Transforming Data During a Load
* : Data Sharing Overview
* : Secure Views
* : Cloning Databases, Schemas, and Tables
* : Cloning for Testing and Development

Q41. A media company needs a data pipeline that will ingest customer review data into a Snowflake table, and apply some transformations. The company also needs to use Amazon Comprehend to do sentiment analysis and make the de-identified final data set available publicly for advertising companies who use different cloud providers in different regions.
The data pipeline needs to run continuously ang efficiently as new records arrive in the object storage leveraging event notifications. Also, the operational complexity, maintenance of the infrastructure, including platform upgrades and security, and the development effort should be minimal.
Which design will meet these requirements?

Ingest the data using COPY INTO and use streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations. Export the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and ingest the data back into a Snowflake table. Then create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Ingest the data using Snowpipe and use streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations. Create an external function to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and write the final records to a Snowflake table. Then create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Ingest the data into Snowflake using Amazon EMR and PySpark using the Snowflake Spark connector.
Apply transformations using another Spark job. Develop a python program to do model inference by leveraging the Amazon Comprehend text analysis API. Then write the results to a Snowflake table and create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Ingest the data using Snowpipe and use streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations. Export the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and ingest the data back into a Snowflake table. Then create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Q42. A table, EMP_ TBL has three records as shown:

The following variables are set for the session:

Which SELECT statements will retrieve all three records? (Select TWO).

Select * FROM Stbl_ref WHERE Scol_ref IN (‘Name1′,’Nam2′,’Name3’);

SELECT * FROM EMP_TBL WHERE identifier(Scol_ref) IN (‘Namel’,’Name2′, ‘Name3’);

SELECT * FROM identifier<Stbl_ref> WHERE NAME IN ($var1, $var2, $var3);

SELECT * FROM identifier($tbl_ref) WHERE ID IN Cvarl’,’var2′,’var3′);

SELECT * FROM $tb1_ref WHERE $col_ref IN ($var1, Svar2, Svar3);

Q43. Which columns can be included in an external table schema? (Select THREE).

VALUE

METADATASROW_ID

METADATASISUPDATE

METADAT A$ FILENAME

METADATAS FILE_ROW_NUMBER

METADATASEXTERNAL TABLE PARTITION

Q44. A media company needs a data pipeline that will ingest customer review data into a Snowflake table, and apply some transformations. The company also needs to use Amazon Comprehend to do sentiment analysis and make the de-identified final data set available publicly for advertising companies who use different cloud providers in different regions.
The data pipeline needs to run continuously and efficiently as new records arrive in the object storage leveraging event notifications. Also, the operational complexity,maintenance of the infrastructure, including platform upgrades and security, and the development effort should be minimal.
Which design will meet these requirements?

Ingest the data using copy into and use streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations. Export the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and ingest the data back into a Snowflake table. Then create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Ingest the data using Snowpipe and use streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations. Create an external function to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and write the final records to a Snowflake table. Then create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Ingest the data into Snowflake using Amazon EMR and PySpark using the Snowflake Spark connector.
Apply transformations using another Spark job. Develop a python program to do model inference by leveraging the Amazon Comprehend text analysis API. Then write the results to a Snowflake table and create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Ingest the data using Snowpipe and use streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations. Export the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and ingest the data back into a Snowflake table. Then create a listing in the Snowflake Marketplace to make the data available to other companies.

Option B is the best design to meet the requirements because it uses Snowpipe to ingest the data continuously and efficiently as new records arrive in the object storage, leveraging event notifications. Snowpipe is a service that automates the loading of data from external sources into Snowflake tables1. It also uses streams and tasks to orchestrate transformations on the ingested data. Streams are objects that store the change history of a table, and tasks are objects that execute SQL statements on a schedule or when triggered by another task2.
Option B also uses an external function to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend and write the final records to a Snowflake table. An external function is a user-defined function that calls an external API, such as Amazon Comprehend, to perform computations that are not natively supported by Snowflake3. Finally, option B uses the Snowflake Marketplace to make the de-identified final data set available publicly for advertising companies who use different cloud providers in different regions. The Snowflake Marketplace is a platform that enables data providers to list and share their data sets with data consumers, regardless of the cloud platform or region they use4.
Option A is not the best design because it uses copy into to ingest the data, which is not as efficient and continuous as Snowpipe. Copy into is a SQL command that loads datafrom files into a table in a single transaction. It also exports the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend, which adds an extra step and increases the operational complexity and maintenance of the infrastructure.
Option C is not the best design because it uses Amazon EMR and PySpark to ingest and transform the data, which also increases the operational complexity and maintenance of the infrastructure. Amazon EMR is a cloud service that provides a managed Hadoop framework to process and analyze large-scale data sets.
PySpark is a Python API for Spark, a distributed computing framework that can run on Hadoop. Option C also develops a python program to do model inference by leveraging the Amazon Comprehend text analysis API, which increases the development effort.
Option D is not the best design because it is identical to option A, except for the ingestion method. It still exports the data into Amazon S3 to do model inference with Amazon Comprehend, which adds an extra step and increases the operational complexity and maintenance of the infrastructure.
References: 1: Snowpipe Overview 2: Using Streams and Tasks to Automate Data Pipelines 3: External Functions Overview 4: Snowflake Data Marketplace Overview : [Loading Data Using COPY INTO] : [What is Amazon EMR?] : [PySpark Overview]

Q45. An Architect is troubleshooting a query with poor performance using the QUERY_HIST0RY function. The Architect observes that the COMPILATIONJHME is greater than the EXECUTIONJTIME.
What is the reason for this?

The query is processing a very large dataset.

The query has overly complex logic.

The query is queued for execution.

The query is reading from remote storage.

Q46. The Business Intelligence team reports that when some team members run queries for their dashboards in parallel with others, the query response time is getting significantly slower What can a Snowflake Architect do to identify what is occurring and troubleshoot this issue?

A computer error message Description automatically generated

A close up of text Description automatically generated

A black text on a white background Description automatically generated

A screen shot of a computer Description automatically generated

Q47. What built-in Snowflake features make use of the change tracking metadata for a table? (Choose two.)

The CHANGE_DATA_CAPTURE command

A STREAM object

The CHANGES clause

The MERGE command

The UPSERT command

Q48. An Architect needs to automate the daily Import of two files from an external stage into Snowflake. One file has Parquet-formatted data, the other has CSV-formatted data.
How should the data be joined and aggregated to produce a final result set?

Use Snowpipe to ingest the two files, then create a materialized view to produce the final result set.

Create a task using Snowflake scripting that will import the files, and then call a User-Defined Function (UDF) to produce the final result set.

Create a JavaScript stored procedure to read. join, and aggregate the data directly from the external stage, and then store the results in a table.

Create a materialized view to read, Join, and aggregate the data directly from the external stage, and use the view to produce the final result set